Open Access
The white and red forces of the Civil War: problems of modern public interpretation of historical memory in Finland
Author(s) -
E. A. Kuzmenko
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
rossiâ i mir: naučnyj dialog
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2782-3067
DOI - 10.53658/rw2021-1-2-62-77
Subject(s) - spanish civil war , independence (probability theory) , narrative , interpretation (philosophy) , nationality , white (mutation) , narrative history , comparative historical research , collective memory , sociology , history , law , political science , social science , immigration , literature , linguistics , philosophy , art , statistics , biochemistry , mathematics , chemistry , gene
The article characterizes the modern public discourse in Finland on the impact of the red and white forces on the developments unfolding in the course of the Civil War through the interpretation of historical sources. It also draws a conclusion about the transformations that historical memory has experienced in Finland over the past decades. The research tasks are solved by using the methodology of historical trauma and mechanisms of its overcoming, the historical narration of everyday life, sociological methods. The article considers the concepts of ofcial scientic and public discourse on controversial historical issues, indicates the different functional content of these categories. The fact of granting independence to Finland in 1918, and most importantly, the fact that the independence was maintained further on, was actualized in the public narrative in 2018. On this basis, it is possible to analyze the assessment of the white and red forces within modern Finnish society, due to the higher interest to the Civil War in connection with the Jubilee data and comparatively larger number of sources on historic memory that have appeared in scientic discourse. In the interwar period, Finland saw the cult of the Civil (“Liberation”) War, where the red forces were presented as opponents of the independence of the state, and the whites, on the contrary, contributed to the acquisition of the sovereignty. However the statistical data, commemorative products, cultural phenomena presented in the article show that the public discourse about the Civil War tends to smooth the categorical evaluations, despite the fact that the discourse about the further Winter War and, moreover, the World War II tends to exacerbate the approach. The Finnish society is aware of the need to investigate crimes against the reds, preserves the memory of war crimes on both sides, and keeps the war graves of both Reds and Whites in the similar way. The rethinking of the legacy of civil confrontation is the potential for humanitarian dialogue between Russia and Finland.