z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Irrigant selection for treating trauma wounds on injured wildlife patients
Author(s) -
Kariana Atkinson,
David L. McRuer
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
wildlife rehabilitation bulletin
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2769-6960
pISSN - 1535-2242
DOI - 10.53607/wrb.v37.127
Subject(s) - medicine , wildlife , surgery , wound infection , intensive care medicine , biology , ecology
Contaminated wounds are frequently encountered on injured wildlife patients. Left untreated, contaminated wounds may result in infection with ongoing complications. Wound irrigation is an essential part wound treatment and arguably the most effective means of preventing wound infection. Successful treatment depends on a number of factors but selecting the most appropriate irrigant for the type of wound, degree and type of contamination, species and patient status is up to the informed caregiver. This article discusses some of the pros and cons of common irrigants used in veterinary wound management and best practices for application.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here