z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
No tyranny for failing Donald Trump – sad! Law, constitutionalism and tyranny in the twenty-first century
Author(s) -
Aoife O’Donoghue
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
northern ireland legal quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2514-4936
pISSN - 0029-3105
DOI - 10.53386/nilq.v72i3.978
Subject(s) - presidency , constitutionalism , law , presidential system , political science , denial , sociology , democracy , politics , psychology , psychoanalysis
Donald Trump’s presidency resulted in several accusations of tyrannical intent. The end of his term of office, and particularly the rioting of 6 January 2021 and the denial of the presidential election results, did little to dispel those accusations. Tyranny, while perhaps not fashionable as a basis of analysis, has a long-intertwined relationship with law and constitutionalism. This article uses Donald Trump’s presidency to consider the relationships between tyranny, tyrannicide, law and constitutionalism. The article considers law and constitutionalism’s role in both preventing and advancing the advent of tyranny and examines their limitations in stopping tyrannical intent. Public contestation is put forward as an equally significant bulwark against the advent of tyranny, but also a space under tremendous pressure during Donald Trump’s presidency.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here