z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Role of Postpartum IUCD Insertion after C-Section
Author(s) -
Sumera Chaudary,
Saba Tufail,
Abroo Fatima,
Uzma Manzoor,
Nosheen Maqsood,
Sana Sharif
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
pakistan journal of medical and health sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.114
H-Index - 7
ISSN - 1996-7195
DOI - 10.53350/pjmhs22163571
Subject(s) - caesarean section , medicine , obstetrics and gynaecology , group b , obstetrics , inclusion and exclusion criteria , postpartum bleeding , gynecology , surgery , pregnancy , genetics , alternative medicine , pathology , biology
Objective: To evaluate the outcome of C-section with and without postpartum IUCD insertion in terms of wound infection and bleeding. Methodology: In this Randomized Control Trial, at Department of Obstetrics/Gynaecology, Allied Hospital, Faisalabad during the years 209-20, we included 302 cases (151 in each group) who fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two groups were formed, Group A with inserted IUCD and Group B without IUCD insertion. Bleeding and wound infection was compared in both groups within seven days of caesarean section. Results: Both groups were insignificant regarding bleeding and wound infection. 6.6%(n=10) in Group-A and 5.3%(n=8) in B Group had wound infected (p=0.627), 2.6%(n=4) group A cases and 1.3%(n=2) cases of B group were recorded with bleeding (0.410). Conclusion: Insertion of postpartum IUCD is not significantly different when compared without IUCD insertion regarding heavy bleeding and wound infection. Keywords: C-section - caesarean section, IUCD - intrauterine contraceptive device.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom