z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evaluation of adult and elderly performance in MoCA and verbal fluency test in Recife-PE
Author(s) -
Talita Gabriele de Queiroz Plácido,
Pedro Augusto Sampaio RochaFilho,
Mário Luciano de Mélo Silva Júnior
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
sao paulo medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
eISSN - 1806-9460
pISSN - 1516-3180
DOI - 10.5327/1516-3180.274
Subject(s) - montreal cognitive assessment , verbal fluency test , fluency , audiology , correlation , cognition , test (biology) , life expectancy , population , psychology , intraclass correlation , medicine , pearson product moment correlation coefficient , gerontology , cognitive impairment , developmental psychology , statistics , psychometrics , psychiatry , neuropsychology , mathematics , biology , mathematics education , geometry , environmental health , paleontology
Background: Considering the increase in life expectancy, the use of screening tests contributes to the detection of cognitive decline. However, different socioeconomic conditions can influence the performance of individuals. Objectives: To compare the performance of participants in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Verbal Fluency Test (VFT), assessing the influence of schooling on the score. Design and setting: Cross-sectional, descriptive study, with 21 participants without cognitive complaints, between January and April 2021, in Recife, Pernambuco. Methods: Data were analyzed through SPSS software, Shapiro-Wilk test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC). Results: In all, 21 MoCA tests were applied (Average score: 19.8 points; SD = ± 4.3). The population has a mean age of 56.2 years (SD = ± 10.2), education of 11.8 years (SD = ± 3.5), and a predominance of females (93.5%). In the VFT, the total average performance resulted in 11.5 words (SD = ± 5.1), the first interval, 6.1 (SD = ± 2.5), the second, 2.8 (SD = ± 1, 9) and the third, 2.1 (SD = ± 2.1). There was a correlation between the performance in MoCA and VFT (PCC = 0.717; P = 0.01), and between performance and years of schooling (MoCA: PCC = 0.688; P = 0.01 vs VFT: PCC = 0.489; P = 0.02). Conclusions: Both tools were correlated with the participant’s level of education. However, VFT obtained a lower correlation

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom