z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Letter to the Editor
Author(s) -
N Smallwood
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
acute medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.14
H-Index - 12
eISSN - 1747-4892
pISSN - 1747-4884
DOI - 10.52964/amja.0870
Subject(s) - nice , medicine , pulmonary embolism , intensive care medicine , cardiology , computer science , programming language
I read the recent article by Apsey et al with interest, which recommended "the potential benefits of thrombolytic therapy in massive and submassive pulmonary embolism". This would appear to go against current NICE guidance which states "Do not offer pharmacological systemic thrombolytic therapy to people with PE and haemodynamic stability with or without right ventricular dysfunction". Both recent NICE and European pulmonary embolism (PE) guidance are clear that only high-risk PE (previously called 'massive') should routinely be thrombolysed.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here