z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The way healthcare is funded is wrong: it should be linked to deaths as well as age, gender and social deprivation
Author(s) -
Rodney Jones,
John Kellett
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
acute medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1747-4892
pISSN - 1747-4884
DOI - 10.52964/amja.0733
Subject(s) - medicine , social deprivation , health care , social care , gerontology , nursing , economic growth , economics
Background: most spending on health occurs in the last few months of life. This study explored the number of deaths in England and their relationship to healthcare funding. Methods: post hoc analysis Results: the number of deaths range from 3.3 to 15.1/1000/year, and the number of deaths per general practitioner from 5.2 to 27.3/year. Hospital deaths range from 12 to 52/1000 admissions. The correlation between the allocation index used for funding and deaths is not perfect and suggests that some regions may get up to17% less and others 14% more funding than is equitable. Conclusion: there is considerable variation in the prevalence of death throughout England. If healthcare funding considered the local number of deaths it would be more equitable.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here