z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Brief Rationale for MMT Arguments
Author(s) -
Yasuhito Tanaka
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
issues in social science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2329-521X
DOI - 10.5296/iss.v9i2.19160
Subject(s) - underemployment , deficit spending , economics , inflation (cosmology) , full employment , recession , macroeconomics , unemployment , simple (philosophy) , keynesian economics , debt , physics , theoretical physics , philosophy , epistemology
In this note we examine MMT (Modern Monetary Theory) arguments by a simple macroeconomic model without microeconomic foundation. Mainly we will show the following results. 1) In the underemployment case the national income is determined by the budget deficit. 2) In the full employment case we can define the budget deficit which is necessary and sufficient to achieve full employment. 3) The excessive budget deficit causes inflation. 4) We need budget deficit to achieve and maintain full employment under economic growth. 5) We can recover recession by the budget deficit which is larger than that when full employment is maintained. Also, we show that the budget deficit equals the increase in the savings between generations.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here