Open AccessSystematic Reviews to Strengthen Evidence-based Nursing Practice
Author(s) -
Miguel Fuentealba-Torres,
Zita Lagos Sánchez,
Vilanice Alves de Araújo Püschel,
Denisse Cartagena
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
aquichan
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.137
H-Index - 8
eISSN - 2027-5374
pISSN - 1657-5997
DOI - 10.5294/aqui.2021.21.4.5
Subject(s) - systematic review , evidence based practice , systematic error , nursing practice , medicine , medline , systematic process , nursing , alternative medicine , business , political science , pathology , work in process , statistics , mathematics , marketing , law
Systematic reviews are essential to developing evidence-based nursing practice. The JBI, formerly known as the Joanna Briggs Institute, has contributed significantly to research through technical training on reviews. Cochrane Living Systematic Reviews and Systematic Reviews of Measurement Instruments have been approaches recently used by the scientific community. The purpose of Living Systematic Reviews is to continuously update priority issues, while Systematic Reviews of Measurement Instruments condense evidence on the validity of measurement instruments. This article overviews the JBI Systematic Review approaches and provides critical information about Cochrane Living Systematic Reviews and Systematic Reviews of Measurement Instruments. The use of these new approaches is necessary to maintain the evidence-based nursing practice and advance nursing knowledge.