z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
When Courts do Politics: Public Interest Law and Litigation in East Africa by J Oloka- Onyango
Author(s) -
Melissa Mungai
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
˜the œstrathmore law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2415-5349
pISSN - 2414-8164
DOI - 10.52907/slr.v3i1.106
Subject(s) - scrutiny , law , politics , constitution , legislature , status quo , political science , separation of powers , government (linguistics) , order (exchange) , public interest , sociology , economics , philosophy , linguistics , finance
An all-too-simplistic appreciation of the relationship among the three arms of government should be excluded in order to get the gist of Oloka’s writing. He pulls apart the idea that courts simply interpret the law, keeping off from legislative and executive duties. Instead, the author introduces the notion that courts are not insulated from the ‘waves of politics’. In this regard, he invites scrutiny of their powers: of judicial review, to declare a law invalid, to appoint and vet judges, and to interpret the constitution. These defy a purist understanding of the classical separation of powers theory which holds that ‘judges should just judge’ and in this sense avoid upsetting the status quo.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here