z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A health economic outcome evaluation of an internet-based mobile-supported stress management intervention for employees
Author(s) -
David Daniel Ebert,
Fanny Kählke,
Claudia Buntrock,
Matthias Berking,
Filip Smit,
Elena Heber,
Harald Baumeister,
Burkhardt Funk,
Heleen Riper,
Dirk Lehr
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
scandinavian journal of work, environment and health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.621
H-Index - 103
eISSN - 1795-990X
pISSN - 0355-3140
DOI - 10.5271/sjweh.3691
Subject(s) - medicine , randomized controlled trial , physical therapy , stress management , randomization , psychological intervention , confidence interval , cost effectiveness , intervention (counseling) , clinical psychology , nursing , surgery , risk analysis (engineering)
Objective This study aimed to estimate and evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of a guided internet- and mobile-supported occupational stress-management intervention (iSMI) for employees from the employer's perspective alongside a randomized controlled trial. Methods A sample of 264 employees with elevated symptoms of perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale, PSS-10 ≥22) was randomly assigned either to the iSMI or a waitlist control (WLC) group with unrestricted access to treatment as usual. The iSMI consisted of seven sessions of problem-solving and emotion-regulation techniques and one booster session. Self-report data on symptoms of perceived stress and economic data were assessed at baseline, and at six months following randomization. A cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) with symptom-free status as the main outcome from the employer's perspective was carried out. Statistical uncertainty was estimated using bootstrapping (N=5000). Results The CBA yielded a net-benefit of EUR181 [95% confidence interval (CI) -6043-1042] per participant within the first six months following randomization. CEA showed that at a willingness-to-pay ceiling of EUR0, EUR1000, EUR2000 for one additional symptom free employee yielded a 67%, 90%, and 98% probability, respectively, of the intervention being cost-effective compared to the WLC. Conclusion The iSMI was cost-effective when compared to WLC and even lead to cost savings within the first six months after randomization. Offering stress-management interventions can present good value for money in occupational healthcare.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here