Open AccessAssessing the possible extent of confounding in occupational case-referent studies.
Author(s) -
Harvey Checkoway,
Gretchen Waldman
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
scandinavian journal of work, environment and health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.621
H-Index - 103
eISSN - 1795-990X
pISSN - 0355-3140
DOI - 10.5271/sjweh.2243
Subject(s) - confounding , referent , medicine , cohort study , statistics , cohort , environmental health , mathematics , pathology , philosophy , linguistics
Case-referent studies nested within occupational cohort studies are efficient designs for estimating relative risks associated with exposures and for obtaining data on nonoccupational confounding factors. Frequently, however, only incomplete data on confounders can be obtained from sources such as next-of-kin or co-workers. A method for assessing the potential extent of confounding in cohort studies described previously by Axelson [Scand J Work Environ Health 4 (1978) 98-102] can be adapted for use in nested case-referent studies. An example is shown to illustrate that the adapted Axelson method is preferable to the usual confounder adjustment techniques when data on the confounder are incomplete.