Open AccessComparing best-worst method and full consistency method in a fuzzy environment
Author(s) -
Arash Haqbin
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
decision science letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.384
H-Index - 18
eISSN - 1929-5804
pISSN - 1929-5812
DOI - 10.5267/j.dsl.2021.11.002
Subject(s) - multiple criteria decision analysis , pairwise comparison , consistency (knowledge bases) , fuzzy logic , computer science , operations research , mathematical optimization , mathematics , management science , data mining , artificial intelligence , engineering
Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) is one the most important branches of decision theory. Due to the fact that MCDM methods have the utmost significance in management, scholars try to develop more MCDM methods. Since calculating the weights of criteria is an important step in any MCDM method, increasing the accuracy of weight calculating methods can highly affect these methods. This accuracy can be improved by less pairwise comparison between criteria. To this end, the present study seeks to make a comparison between two new weight calculating techniques, namely BWM and FUCOM in a fuzzy environment using a real-world case study Results of this study shows that FUCOM-F provides more reliable results compared to FBWM since its consistency is less than FBWM by a great amount.