z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Deeply Ecological Deleuze and Guattari
Author(s) -
Richard Ives
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
humanimalia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2151-8645
DOI - 10.52537/humanimalia.9992
Subject(s) - deleuze and guattari , oppression , epistemology , anthropocene , reading (process) , power (physics) , humanism , anthropocentrism , environmental ethics , sociology , philosophy , ecology , politics , law , political science , theology , linguistics , physics , quantum mechanics , biology
Through a critical reading of the notion of “becoming-animal” as proposed by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, it is argued in this paper that the drawing of a simple division between the wild and the tame inevitably results in a restricted concept of ethics that reiterates contemporary structures of oppression. One of the main reasons for the recent interest in Deleuze and Guattari from within critical animal studies is that their philosophy appears to give to nonhuman animals an access to a “becoming” that is equal in power and affect to those open to the human. Upon closer reading, however, it transpires that this equality is just as quickly refused. Ultimately, Deleuze and Guattari, in common with the adherents of Deep Ecology, posit an entry into becoming which effects itself upon the timelessness of the wild, termed “true Nature” by Deleuze and Guattari. As a result, the vast diversity of nonhuman animals are dissolved in a becoming-Nature which lacks both responsibility and respond-ability, thus reinforcing the subjugating superiority both of humanist exceptionalism and of Man’s emergence from a feminized Nature.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here