
What's Law Got to Do With It? Dignity and Menstruation
Author(s) -
Elizabeth B. Cooper
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
columbia journal of gender and law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2333-4339
pISSN - 1062-6220
DOI - 10.52214/cjgl.v41i1.8819
Subject(s) - dignity , law , political science , government (linguistics) , state (computer science) , democracy , politics , philosophy , linguistics , algorithm , computer science
When I think about all that is wrong in the world—the threat to democracy in the United States, the persistent systemic and individually-inflicted racism, the devastation wrought by COVID-19—I find myself asking, “Why do I care so much about menstrual laws and policies?” The answer, I have realized, is quite simple: the failure of the government and private institutions to adopt sane, respectful, smart policies concerning menstruation is an affront to dignity.
Myriad policies intruding on a menstruator’s right to dignity are described throughout this Symposium and include: failing to include menstrual products in emergency- preparedness or response packages; not supplying public school students with free access to quality products; denying free and ready access to such products to people who are incarcerated or detained through our country’s immigration policies; imposing state and use taxes on such products as though they are “non-essential” goods; and not permitting menstruators to bring their own products into the bar exam.