Talking to Walls: The Socialist Calculation Debate that Never Really Was One | Zendy

Brecht L. Arnaert | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Talking to Walls: The Socialist Calculation Debate that Never Really Was One

Author(s) -

Brecht L. Arnaert

Publication year - 2018

Publication title -

revista procesos de mercado

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

ISSN - 1697-6797

DOI - 10.52195/pm.v15i2.56

Subject(s) - oskar , argument (complex analysis) , socialism , nothing , politics , philosophy , market socialism , sociology , political science , neoclassical economics , law , law and economics , political economy , economics , epistemology , history , art history , communism , biochemistry , chemistry

In his book «Socialism, Economic calculation and Entrepreneur-ship» Dr. Jesus Huerta de Soto (2010) gives an account of the his-tory of the socialist calculation debate, in which he shows very clearly why the political left today still believes a socialist econ-omy is possible. The popular wisdom in those circles, namely, is that in 1936, Oskar Lange (Lange, October 1936: 53–71 & February 1937) succeeded in refuting Mises’ claim that central planning could not work because the information that is needed to draw up such plans can only be generated in a free market. This paper wants to show that nothing could be further from the truth: Lange never answered Mises’ fundamental challenge, nor was there any other socialist economist that has been able to refute his central argument. A lot of straw men died, but Mises’ funda-mental argument lives.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research