Open AccessUse of Google Classroom in Facial Skin Care Courses with Technology
Author(s) -
Hasri Mutiara Putri,
Aniesa Puspa Arum,
Neneng Siti Silfi Ambarwati
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
radiant
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2723-4614
DOI - 10.52187/rdt.v2i3.78
Subject(s) - likert scale , cosmetology , skin care , psychology , psychomotor learning , medical education , test (biology) , sample (material) , product (mathematics) , mathematics education , medicine , cognition , nursing , mathematics , developmental psychology , art , paleontology , chemistry , chromatography , neuroscience , visual arts , biology , geometry
Learning outcomes are a learning carried out by someone after going through the process of learning activities, which uses an assessment tool prepared by the teacher, such as an evaluation test that includes cognitive, affective and psychomotor aspects. This study aims to determine the relationship between student interest in the use of Google Classroom with learning outcomes of facial skin care with technology. This research is a quantitative research with a survey method with a sample of 65 students of the Cosmetology Education study program batch 2020. The data for the X variable (student interest in using Google Classroom) was obtained by distributing questionnaires with a Likert scale. Meanwhile, the Y variable data (Learning Results of Facial Skin Care with Technology) was obtained from Form 06. The results of the analysis with product moment correlation showed that there was no positive and significant relationship between students' interest in learning outcomes of facial skin care with technology. Based on the calculations obtained a significance value of 0.274 which means it is greater than 0.05. So it can be concluded that Ho which reads: "Students' Interest in Using Google Classroom does not have a positive effect on Learning Outcomes of Facial Skin Care with Technology" is accepted. On the other hand, "Students' Interest in Using Google Classroom has a positive effect on Learning Outcomes of Facial Skin Care with Technology" is rejected. The effective contribution was obtained by 1.9% and the remaining 98.1% was not examined in this study.