z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Sobre el debate del historicismo y el anti-historicismo en Deleuze
Author(s) -
Antonelli Marangi,
Marcelo Sebastián
Publication year - 1970
Publication title -
revista de filosofía/revista de filosofia
Language(s) - Spanish
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.115
H-Index - 3
eISSN - 1695-5129
pISSN - 0034-8244
DOI - 10.5209/resf.55449
Subject(s) - historicism , realm , philosophy , philosophy of history , history of philosophy , epistemology , humanities , history , archaeology
Tras elaborar una versión de la Historia Universal motorizada por la producción deseante, Deleuze adoptó un viraje anti-historicista, desplazándose a los devenires no históricos y multiplicando perspectivas negativas sobre la historia. En el marco del debate entre quienes le adjudican posiciones exclusivamente anti-historicistas y quienes le atribuyen una filosofía de la historia o una metodología historicista, proponemos elucidar las críticas deleuzianas a la historia sirviéndonos de la distinción entre la historia como realidad objetiva y la disciplina histórica. Además, analizamos la primacía otorgada a la filosofía sobre la historia a partir de su concepción del acontecimiento y su temporalidad.After having elaborated a Universal History version motorized by desiring production, Deleuze adopted an anti-historicist turn, concentrated on non-historical becomings and made the negative perspectives upon History soar. Within the realm of the debate between those who grant him anti-historicist positions exclusively, and those who endow him a Philosophy of History or a historicist methodology, we intend to shed light on the deleuzian critics to history making use of the difference between History as reality and as discipline. Furthermore, we shall explain the valorization of Philosophy over History based on Deleuze’s conception of event and its time

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here