
The terms of a theoretical approach of the natural and divine world in George Pachymeres
Author(s) -
Lydia Petridou,
Christos Térézis
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
de medio aevo
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.102
0ISSN - 2255-5889
DOI - 10.5209/dmae.72855
Subject(s) - george (robot) , judgement , natural (archaeology) , philosophy , context (archaeology) , epistemology , subject (documents) , mysticism , theology , art history , history , computer science , archaeology , library science
In this article, we are investigating the methods in which George Pachymeres, the commentator of the De divinis nominibus of Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, epistemologically approaches the natural and the divine reality. It becomes clear that every judgement on God starts from the sensible world, so a reversed induction is revealed. Although the existence of God is never questioned, no final conclusion about his self-founding way of existing can be drawn. Considering the substantial difference between the two levels, two are the ways in which the natural world and the divine transcendent reality are approached. In the first case, the thinking subject functions mostly in natural-empirical terms, while in the second one it follows a mystical-intuitive course. Nevertheless, the context is consistently realistic.