Embolization for acute gastrointestinal bleeding

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the clinical success and complication rates following interventional embolization for treatment of acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) at a tertiary care centre. The secondary purpose was to evaluate results of practice change whereby multiphase CT angiography was requested prior to conventional angiograms. Methods: A retrospective chart review and analysis of 38 patients undergoing Interventional Radiology guided embolization for acute GIB was performed. Clinical success was defined as patient stability 30 days’ post embolization and complications included subsequent bleeding requiring endoscopy, surgery or additional embolization, or death. Results: Overall clinical success rate was 86.8% (33/38). Complications included 14 patients (36.8%) experiencing continued bleeding, 6 patients (15.8%) requiring repeat endoscopic evaluation, 8 patients (21.1%) requiring surgery, 3 patients (7.9%) requiring repeat embolization, and 4 deaths (10.5%). These results were not inferior to clinical success rates reported in the literature for GIB regardless of location. Positive predictive value for multiphase CT angiogram was 92.3% and the negative predictive value was 57.1%. Conclusions: Interventional angiography and embolization is an effective treatment for GIB with the most common complication being recurrent bleeding which may require additional endoscopic evaluation, surgical intervention or additional embolization. Clinical success and complication rates at this centre are similar to those reported in the literature. Continued evaluation of the utility of multiphase CT angiography prior to conducting embolization should be considered to determine its impact on rates of negative angiogram studies.