z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Biological Faithfulness is Unnecessary for Machine Learning
Author(s) -
Meagan Wiederman
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
uwomj/medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2560-8274
pISSN - 0042-0336
DOI - 10.5206/uwomj.v87i2.1134
Subject(s) - backpropagation , artificial intelligence , computer science , black box , feature (linguistics) , machine learning , artificial neural network , turing machine , turing test , turing , cognitive science , psychology , algorithm , linguistics , philosophy , computation , programming language
Artificial intelligence (AI) is the ability of any device to take an input, like that of its environment, and work to achieve a desired output. Some advancements in AI have focused n replicating the human brain in machinery. This is being made possible by the human connectome project: an initiative to map all the connections between neurons within the brain. A full replication of the thinking brain would inherently create something that could be argued to be a thinking machine. However, it is more interesting to question whether a non-biologically faithful AI could be considered as a thinking machine. Under Turing’s definition of ‘thinking’, a machine which can be mistaken as human when responding in writing from a “black box,” where they can not be viewed, can be said to pass for thinking. Backpropagation is an error minimizing algorithm to program AI for feature detection with no biological counterpart which is prevalent in AI. The recent success of backpropagation demonstrates that biological faithfulness is not required for deep learning or ‘thought’ in a machine. Backpropagation has been used in medical imaging compression algorithms and in pharmacological modelling.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here