Open AccessDecision-making in paediatric palliative care interpreting
Author(s) -
Melissa Contreras-Nourse
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
linguistica antverpiensia new series - themes in translation studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2295-5739
DOI - 10.52034/lanstts.v20i.594
Subject(s) - beneficence , interpreter , autonomy , palliative care , context (archaeology) , economic justice , psychology , value (mathematics) , medical education , work (physics) , nursing , medicine , engineering ethics , computer science , political science , mechanical engineering , paleontology , machine learning , law , biology , programming language , engineering
The interpreting profession has long used metaphors or rule statements to describe and teach the ways in which practitioners make decisions (Dean & Pollard, 2011, 2018). Interpreting students are also often taught that the context of an encounter will dictate their decision-making by way of statements such as “it depends”. Such pedagogical statements can make talk between a practitioner and a medical professional about the responsibilities of an interpreter during medical encounters difficult. This study is based on the work of Dean and Pollard (2011, 2018) on value-based decision-making and is guided by the four principles of biomedical ethics (respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice). It has sought to provide evidence of the existence, applicability and usability of these frameworks through a single case study of a real-life appointment in which a parent of a palliative care outpatient and a medical professional communicated during a consultation, aided by a medical interpreter.