z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
DIMINISHING THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF TROLLING: THE IMPACTS OF RECENT JUDICIAL ACTIVITY ON NON-PRACTICING ENTITIES
Author(s) -
Holly Forsberg
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
pittsburgh journal of technology law and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2164-800X
DOI - 10.5195/tlp.2012.94
Subject(s) - attractiveness , business , profit (economics) , patent troll , perception , for profit , law and economics , patent law , intellectual property , law , economics , political science , finance , psychology , microeconomics , neuroscience , psychoanalysis
The United States patent system has increasingly been faced with complications presented by a type of non-practicing entity known as ‗patent trolls‘—patent owner entities that do not actively innovate, develop or manufacture patented material but instead seek to profit from patent ownership through licensing agreements and litigation.  This article explores arguments on both sides of the non-practicing entity debate and evaluates perceptions of this activity as both an accessible secondary commodities market and a litigation-based business model.  

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here