z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Death Sentences
Author(s) -
Stephen John
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
philosophy of medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2692-3963
DOI - 10.5195/philmed.2022.48
Subject(s) - overdiagnosis , medicalization , analogy , verdict , value (mathematics) , ideal (ethics) , epistemology , criminalization , tinker , leaps , phenomenon , banner , sociology , medicine , psychology , law , philosophy , linguistics , computer science , criminology , political science , psychiatry , financial economics , pathology , machine learning , anthropology , economics
There are many analogies between medical and judicial practice. This article explores one such analogy, between “medicalization” and “criminalization.” Specifically, drawing on an analogy between a judge’s speech act of delivering a verdict and a physician’s speech act of giving a diagnosis, it suggests a novel account of the phenomenon of “overdiagnosis.” Using this approach, we can make some headway in understanding debates over the early detection of cancer. The final section outlines the relationship between this approach and familiar debates in philosophy of medicine on the nature of disease and in philosophy of science on the “value-free ideal.”

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here