z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Interpreting Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
Author(s) -
Keith Meadows
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
philosophy of medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2692-3963
DOI - 10.5195/philmed.2021.66
Subject(s) - patient reported outcome , neglect , standardization , phenomenology (philosophy) , qualitative research , outcome (game theory) , psychology , quality of life (healthcare) , task (project management) , health care , patient experience , epistemology , sociology , computer science , psychotherapist , psychiatry , political science , engineering , economics , social science , philosophy , mathematical economics , systems engineering , law , operating system
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are valued in healthcare evaluation for bringing patient perspectives forward, and enabling patient-centered care. The range of evidence permitted by PROMs to measure patients’ quality of life narrowly denies subjective experience. This neglect is rooted in the epistemic assumptions that ground PROMs, and the tension between the standardization (the task of measurement) and the individual and unique circumstances of patients. To counter the resulting methodological shortcomings, this article proposes a hermeutical approach and interpretive phenomenology instead of generic qualitative research methods.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here