Open AccessUpToDate versus DynaMed: a cross-sectional study comparing the speed and accuracy of two point-of-care information tools
Author(s) -
Glyneva Bradley-Ridout,
Erica Nekolaichuk,
Trevor Jamieson,
Claire Jones,
Natalie Morson,
Rita Chuang,
Elena Springall
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of the medical library association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.102
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1558-9439
pISSN - 1536-5050
DOI - 10.5195/jmla.2021.1176
Subject(s) - computer science , confidence interval , obstetrics and gynaecology , point (geometry) , preference , medicine , family medicine , medical physics , statistics , pregnancy , mathematics , genetics , geometry , biology
To compare the accuracy, time to answer, user confidence, and user satisfaction between UpToDate and DynaMed (formerly DynaMed Plus), which are two popular point-of-care information tools.