UpToDate versus DynaMed: a cross-sectional study comparing the speed and accuracy of two point-of-care information tools | Zendy

Glyneva Bradley-Ridout | Zendy; Erica Nekolaichuk | Zendy; Trevor Jamieson | Zendy; Claire Jones | Zendy; Natalie Morson | Zendy; Rita Chuang | Zendy; Elena Springall | Zendy

Open Access

UpToDate versus DynaMed: a cross-sectional study comparing the speed and accuracy of two point-of-care information tools

Author(s) -

Glyneva Bradley-Ridout,

Erica Nekolaichuk,

Trevor Jamieson,

Claire Jones,

Natalie Morson,

Rita Chuang,

Elena Springall

Publication year - 2021

Publication title -

journal of the medical library association jmla

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.102

H-Index - 58

eISSN - 1558-9439

pISSN - 1536-5050

DOI - 10.5195/jmla.2021.1176

Subject(s) - computer science , confidence interval , obstetrics and gynaecology , point (geometry) , preference , medicine , family medicine , medical physics , statistics , pregnancy , mathematics , genetics , geometry , biology

To compare the accuracy, time to answer, user confidence, and user satisfaction between UpToDate and DynaMed (formerly DynaMed Plus), which are two popular point-of-care information tools.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research