Open AccessINTEGRATING GEO-SPATIAL DATA FOR REGIONAL LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY MODELING IN CONSIDERATION OF RUN-OUT SIGNATURE
Author(s) -
Jhe Syuan Lai,
F. Tsai,
S.-H. Chiang
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.264
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1682-1777
pISSN - 1682-1750
DOI - 10.5194/isprsarchives-xli-b8-89-2016
Subject(s) - digital elevation model , normalized difference vegetation index , landslide , raster data , raster graphics , random forest , terrain , geology , cohen's kappa , data mining , cartography , remote sensing , computer science , geomorphology , geography , artificial intelligence , machine learning , oceanography , climate change
This study implements a data mining-based algorithm, the random forests classifier, with geo-spatial data to construct a regional and rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility model. The developed model also takes account of landslide regions (source, non-occurrence and run-out signatures) from the original landslide inventory in order to increase the reliability of the susceptibility modelling. A total of ten causative factors were collected and used in this study, including aspect, curvature, elevation, slope, faults, geology, NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index), rivers, roads and soil data. Consequently, this study transforms the landslide inventory and vector-based causative factors into the pixel-based format in order to overlay with other raster data for constructing the random forests based model. This study also uses original and edited topographic data in the analysis to understand their impacts to the susceptibility modeling. Experimental results demonstrate that after identifying the run-out signatures, the overall accuracy and Kappa coefficient have been reached to be become more than 85 % and 0.8, respectively. In addition, correcting unreasonable topographic feature of the digital terrain model also produces more reliable modelling results.