Open AccessCLASSIFICATION OF CROPLANDS THROUGH FUSION OF OPTICAL AND SAR TIME SERIES DATA
Author(s) -
Seonyoung Park,
J. Im
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.264
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1682-1777
pISSN - 1682-1750
DOI - 10.5194/isprsarchives-xli-b7-703-2016
Subject(s) - normalized difference vegetation index , support vector machine , remote sensing , sensor fusion , land cover , random forest , time series , environmental science , series (stratigraphy) , digital elevation model , satellite , vegetation (pathology) , computer science , land use , artificial intelligence , geography , climate change , machine learning , geology , medicine , paleontology , oceanography , civil engineering , pathology , aerospace engineering , engineering
Many satellite sensors including Landsat series have been extensively used for land cover classification. Studies have been conducted to mitigate classification problems associated with the use of single data (e.g., such as cloud contamination) through multi-sensor data fusion and the use of time series data. This study investigated two areas with different environment and climate conditions: one in South Korea and the other in US. Cropland classification was conducted by using multi-temporal Landsat 5, Radarsat-1 and digital elevation models (DEM) based on two machine learning approaches (i.e., random forest and support vector machines). Seven classification scenarios were examined and evaluated through accuracy assessment. Results show that SVM produced the best performance (overall accuracy of 93.87%) when using all temporal and spectral data as input variables. Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), SAR backscattering, and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) were identified as more contributing variables than the others for cropland classification.