z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
TWENTIETH-CENTURY LITERARY CRITICISM OF NAKAMA: OBJECTIVE AND ERRONEOUS
Author(s) -
K.F. Adishirinov
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
habaršy. filologiâ ġylymdary seriâsy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1728-7804
DOI - 10.51889/2021-1.1728-7804.30
Subject(s) - successor cardinal , poetry , literature , repetition (rhetorical device) , turkish , criticism , literary criticism , history , art , philosophy , linguistics , mathematical analysis , mathematics
In the scientific article, the author examines the works of Ismail bey Nakam. The first studies on the life and work of Ismail bey Nakam were written by literary critics, contemporaries of the poet. From the beginning of the twentieth century to the present day, there was insufficient information about him in a number of published works, and only a few lines from his poems were given. For many years, his work remained in the shadows. Ali Nazim, F Kasimzadeh subjectively treated the legacy of Nakam and his repetition of the works of Nizami and Fuzuli. However, truthfully evaluating the poet Y. Piriyeva, Sadi Efendiyev, Aliabbas Muznib, B. Akhundov, and the Turkish scientist Agah Sirri Levend revealed the essence of his work and came to the right conclusion. In the studies of these scholars, Nakam stands out as a worthy successor to the artistic traditions of Nizami and Fuzuli.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here