z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Defining legitimate taste in Finland: Does mother tongue matter?
Author(s) -
Riie Heikkilä,
Nina Kahma
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
research on finnish society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2490-0958
pISSN - 1796-8739
DOI - 10.51815/fjsr.110680
Subject(s) - taste , legitimacy , cultural capital , focus group , stereotype (uml) , context (archaeology) , sociology , consumption (sociology) , gender studies , focus (optics) , social psychology , psychology , aesthetics , political science , social science , history , law , anthropology , politics , philosophy , neuroscience , physics , archaeology , optics
Finns are said to be homogenous when it comes to cultural taste. However, the division between the Finnish-speaking majority and the Swedish-speaking minority is often considered significant. Previous study shows that the Swedish-speakers are statistically better-off when it comes to issues such as income and health. The stereotype of the Swedish-speakers is that in cultural consumption they represent upper-class taste. Most contemporary theory claims that the notion of legitimacy itself is changing. The paper examines ideas of legitimate taste brought up in twenty focus groups. We shall compare the linguistic groups and form a picture of what type of culture is considered legitimate by which group. In the end we aim to answer the question of what legitimate taste in the Finnish context means. The paper is based on a focus group study that serves as a pilot research for the project Cultural Capital and Social Differentiation in Contemporary Finland.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here