Open AccessSTUDY ON THE METHODOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES IN TRAINING YOUNG TENNIS PLAYERS
Author(s) -
Răzvan Bucătaru,
Petronel Moisescu
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
interconf
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2709-4685
DOI - 10.51582/interconf.7-8.12.2021.064
Subject(s) - tennis ball , athletes , advertising , psychology , work (physics) , sports equipment , engineering , medical education , applied psychology , business , physical therapy , medicine , mechanical engineering
It has often been said that tennis is very good in attracting new players, but less effective in helping them continue their sports activity, as there are many reasons why those who practise tennis abandon it. In classical tennis, the learning process takes place over several years, being a long-lasting activity (6 -8 years). Tennis 10 is a program that was created and implemented by the International Tennis Federation (ITF) in the early 2000s as part of a campaign called "Tennis Play And Stay". It was officially released in February 2007 and its purpose was to increase the practice of tennis throughout the world. The Tennis Play and Stay campaign aimed at promoting tennis as a sports game easy to play, good to have fun and keep people healthy and making sure that all beginner players could serve and hit the ball from the first lesson. Through this work we have discovered that the means used in Tennis 10 are perceived as superior by the specialists in Romania, compared to the standard methodology in developing physical, technical, tactical training and in the initiation of athletes in the competitive environment.