
Safety And The Unreasonably Dangerous Product
Author(s) -
D. Muster
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
journal of the national academy of forensic engineers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.102
H-Index - 1
eISSN - 2379-3252
pISSN - 2379-3244
DOI - 10.51501/jotnafe.v2i1.390
Subject(s) - context (archaeology) , product (mathematics) , product design , product liability , risk analysis (engineering) , liability , measure (data warehouse) , computer science , engineering , software engineering , business , mathematics , data mining , geometry , paleontology , finance , biology
Two points are made here. First, the classic definition of safety is simply unsuitable as an engineering instruction to a designer. Thus, let us harmonize safety and design by using a different definition. Let us define safety (in the context of product design) as the absence of unreasonable danger. Then, by using the language of the courts and taking into account the engineering implications of the tests used there to assess the presence of design defects in a product, a designer can establish criteria against which to measure its safety before the design is released for manufacture. Second, there have been specific improvements in the design of products that can be attributed to litigation brought under products liability law. With the data base and software being generated today, engineers have at hand the means to create designs that should be safe -- or, let us say, not unreasonably dangerous.