Open AccessMedian Barriers - Are They Needed When They Are Optional?
Author(s) -
Michael Kravitz
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of the national academy of forensic engineers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.102
H-Index - 1
eISSN - 2379-3252
pISSN - 2379-3244
DOI - 10.51501/jotnafe.v15i1.553
Subject(s) - plaintiff , mercury (programming language) , law , geology , aeronautics , forensic engineering , seismology , geography , engineering , political science , computer science , programming language
On February 16, 1993, The Driver Of A 1985 Mercury Two-Door Sedan Was Driving Eastbound On The Bear Mountain Parkway In Westchester County, New York. The Parkway Has Two Lanes In Each Direction With No Median Or Median Barrier Separating Opposing Traffic. Driving Conditions Were Poor Because Of A Beginning Snowstorm. Approaching A Curve To The Right And Downward Grade, The Eastbound Mercury Slid Over The Solid Double Yellow Line And Stopped In The Westbound Driving Lane. Moments Later A Cadillac, Driving Westbound, Unable To Negotiate The Curve To The Left, Or Stop, Collided Head On With The Mercury. As A Result Of The Collision The Driver Of The Mercury, Plaintiff In This Case, Was Rendered A Paraplegic. The Case Was Presented In The Court Of Claims Of The State Of New York In May 1997. The Basis For The Plaintiffs Argument Was: If There Had Been A Concrete Barrier Installed Along The Centerline Of The Roadway The Errant Mercury Would Have Been Deflected Back Into The Eastbound Lane And Would Not Have Crossed Over Into Oncoming Traffic. The Plaintiff Sued The State Of New York.