
Student Achievement in an Introductory Biology Course: Assessing Grade Motivation and Study Log Metacognition
Author(s) -
Gail P. Hollowell,
Dwayne T. Brandon,
Wendy H. Grillo
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
atlas journal of science education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2158-9224
DOI - 10.5147/ajse.v2i2.80
Subject(s) - metacognition , mathematics education , psychology , curriculum , likert scale , class (philosophy) , attrition , medical education , pedagogy , cognition , computer science , medicine , developmental psychology , dentistry , neuroscience , artificial intelligence
As college educators, our main teaching goals are to increase student learning and improve student retention. This study describes how 54 science majors at a public, minority serv- ing institution reflected on their study time, study activities, and overall grade motivation in a core-curriculum introduc- tory biology course. Since 2005, less than 50% of students enrolled in this course at our university earned a final grade of “C” or better. In the Fall semester of 2009, we adminis- tered a pre and post assessment using the Science Motivation Questionnaire (SMQ) a 30-item Likert-type instrument devel- oped by Glynn and Koballa (2006) to better understand and address the student attrition from the introductory biology course. All 30 items from the SMQ were analyzed, but only
5 items relevant to grade motivation are presented in this paper. We also designed and implemented a weekly study log assessment tool for students to document their study time and study activities, wherein students submitted their study logs on a weekly basis during the course of this research study. Based on the number of study logs submitted and study time by each student, students were classified into ei- ther a high-metacognition or low-metacognition group. For our purposes, we defined metacognition as the awareness of one’s own thinking process (Merriam-Webster, 2012). The high-metacognition group submitted 75% of their study logs and earned a grade in the top 25% of the class. The low- metacognition group submitted only 25% of their study logs and earned a grade in the bottom 25% of the class. Thus both groups formed reasonable expectations for their overall class performance.