z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A study to compare task-based mirror therapy versus constraint induced movement therapy for hand function in hemiplegic subjects
Author(s) -
K. Preetha,
U Vimala,
M Kamalakannan
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
biomedicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.498
H-Index - 26
ISSN - 0970-2067
DOI - 10.51248/.v41i3.1204
Subject(s) - constraint induced movement therapy , test (biology) , medicine , physical therapy , physical medicine and rehabilitation , task (project management) , motor function , stroke (engine) , mechanical engineering , paleontology , management , engineering , economics , biology
Introduction and Aim:To find the effectiveness of task-based mirror therapy when compared with constraint-induced movement therapy for hand function in hemiplegic subjects. Stroke is a major health problem in the world. According to various researches, 70%-80% of the patients have the upper extremity impairment then lower extremity. Task-based mirror therapy can be an effective management for premotor cortex impairment. Constraint-induced movement therapy forms the new neural pathway when used properly.   Materials and Methods:30 patients with subacute CVA (cerebrovascular attack) were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups: constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and task-based mirror therapy (TMBT). The full-Meyer motor function assessment was evaluated 4 weeks after treatment.   Results: The results showed that mean value of TMBT (pre-test – 5.733, post-test- 9.86) and SD of (pre-test- 1.67, post-test- 1.92) and in CIMT(pre-test-6.3, post-test-11.13) and SD (Pre-test-1.45,Post-test -1.36).   Conclusion:This study shows that CIMT group showed more improvement than TMBT group.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here