z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Ekonomske odredbe Versajskog mirovnog ugovora: preispitivanje nakon jednog veka
Author(s) -
Борис Беговић
Publication year - 2021
Language(s) - English
DOI - 10.51204/novi_arhiv_pfub_21105a
Subject(s) - german , treaty , political science , surrender , militarism , economic history , law , politics , economy , political economy , history , economics , archaeology
Contrary to widespread belief, reparations imposed on Germany by the economic provisions of the Treaty of Versailles did not undermine the German economy, nor push it into a vicious cycle of crises and backwardness, from which emerged National Socialism and Adolf Hitler’s power takeover. In the first decade after the conclusion of the Treaty of Versailles, Germany’s economy prospered, with high growth rates. In the same decade, German National Socialists managed to win over only a negligible segment of the constituency, and Franco-German relations even improved. The turn took place with the Great Depression, which was, however, not related to the Treaty of Versailles whatsoever. Thus, it is a myth that the Treaty, predominantly through its economic provisions, led to the Second World War. The shortcomings of the Treaty of Versailles, with regard to providing sustainable peace in Europe, should be sought in the framework of the outcome of the First World War, which ended in an armistice, not German surrender. It was only after the Second World War that German unconditional surrender, full occupation of the country and dismemberment of German militarism created the grounds for political stability and sustainable peace in Europe.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here