
Zahtev za povraćaj ulaganja zbog prestanka ugovora o kupoprodaji, najmu i građenju
Author(s) -
Karmem Lutman
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
anali pravnog fakulteta u beogradu
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2406-2693
pISSN - 0003-2565
DOI - 10.51204/anali_pfbu_21106a
Subject(s) - restitution , lease , creditor , unjust enrichment , law , property (philosophy) , debtor , business , law and economics , economics , political science , finance , philosophy , debt , epistemology
Rules on restitution for improvements made to someone else’s propertycan be found in various branches of Slovenian private law, such as the lawof unjustified enrichment, negotiorum gestio, contract law and property law.Even though to some extent these rules deal with very similar situations,they differ in various aspects. While some of them are more favourable tothe creditors in getting as much of their investment back as possible, othersare more inclined toward protecting the debtor against forced financing ofanother’s economic decisions. This paper discusses some open dilemmasconcerning restitution of improvements made to someone else’s propertyin Slovenian contract law. More precisely, it deals with restitutionaryconsequences of failed sales, lease and construction contracts and approachesthis topic from a comparative perspective.