z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Het Escoriaal en de Tombe van Humayun vergeleken
Author(s) -
Liesbeth Geevers
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
tijdschrift voor geschiedenis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.1
H-Index - 6
eISSN - 2352-1163
pISSN - 0040-7518
DOI - 10.5117/tvgesch2018.2.geev
Subject(s) - emperor , art , ancient history , humanities , vault (architecture) , history , visual arts
The Escorial and Humayun’s Tomb in comparison. Shaping the dynastic past of the Mughals and the Habsburgs in the sixteenth century Royal tombs and monuments, such as the imperial tombs of India and the Escorial of Spain, are among the best-known monuments of the early modern period. This article compares the Escorial, which served as the dynastic vault for the Spanish Habsburgs but particularly glorified Emperor Charles V, and the tomb built for the Mughal emperor Humayun. Both were built by their sons, Philip II (r. 1556-1598) and Emperor Akbar (r. 1556-1603). By tracing the building history and the commemorative practices that emerged around these two buildings we can analyse and compare how these two rulers – who were only the third of their line in a new territory – shaped the memory of their fathers and used it to legitimize their own power.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here