Open AccessDe schoonheid van taal - Hoe wezenlijk is het oordeel mooi in taalattitudes?
Author(s) -
Britt Latour,
Stef Grondelaers,
R.W.N.M. van Hout
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
taal en tongval
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2215-1214
pISSN - 0039-8691
DOI - 10.5117/tet2012.2.lato
Subject(s) - beauty , stress (linguistics) , perception , psychology , romance , dynamism , social psychology , grice , categorization , aesthetics , sociology , linguistics , epistemology , art , philosophy , pragmatics , psychoanalysis , neuroscience
This paper reports an experimental answer to a question which has remained controversial since it was put on the agenda in the Romantic era: is beauty individually or communally determined? Applied to our research topic, accent variation in spoken Netherlandic Standard Dutch, this question should be rephrased as: is the perceived beauty of regional accents of Dutch in the eye of the beholder, or is it entrenched in the communal attitudes towards these varieties? Listener-judges rated the audio-taped speech of eight speakers representing four regional accents on traits pertaining to four evaluative dimensions, viz. integrity, dynamism, competence and status, but also on a separate scale pertaining to how beautiful or ugly the speech was found. The experiment reported here confirms prior experimental work which demonstrated that the beauty scale correlated with all the evaluative dimensions inherent in the ratings. This overarching and synthesizing function of the perceived beauty of speech suggests a communal rather than an individual origin of aesthetic perception in the field of language attitudes. We therefore concur with Van Bezooijen (2002) that beauty perceptions afford privileged and convenient access into language attitudes.