Open AccessOral Presentation II
Author(s) -
TaeYon Sung,
Jong Ho Yoon,
Minkyu Han,
Yi Ho Lee,
YuMi Lee,
Dong Eun Song,
Ki-Wook Chung,
Won Kim,
Young Kee Shong,
Suck Joon Hong
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
world journal of endocrine surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.102
H-Index - 4
eISSN - 0975-7902
pISSN - 0975-5039
DOI - 10.5005/wjoes-8-1-8
Subject(s) - medicine , thyroid , logistic regression , ablation , thyroid cancer , thyroid carcinoma , thyroidectomy , propensity score matching , dissection (medical) , urology , surgery
BACKGROUND AND AIMS To compare robot vs open thyroid surgery using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with regard to oncologic safety in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients. METHODS We enrolled 722 patients with PTC who underwent a total thyroidectomy with central compartment node dissection (CCND) at the Asan Medical Center in Korea from January 2009 to December 2010. These patients were classified into open thyroid surgery (n = 610) or robot thyroid surgery (n= 112) groups. We verified the impact of robot thyroid surgery on clinical recurrence and ablation/control-stimulated thyroglobulin (sTg) levels predictive of non-recurrence using weighted logistic regression models with IPTW. RESULTS Age, sex, thyroid weight, extent of CCND, and TNM stage were significantly different between the two groups (p 0.05). Logistic regression with IPTW using the propensity scores estimated by adjusting all of the parameters demonstrated that robot thyroid surgery did not influence the clinical recurrence (OR: 0.784; 95% CI: 0.150–3.403; p = 0.750), ablation sTg (OR: 0.950; 95% CI: 0.361–2.399; p = 0.914), and control sTg levels (OR: 0.498; 95% CI: 0.190–1.189; p = 0.130). CONCLUSION Robot thyroid surgery is comparable to open thyroid surgery with regard to oncologic safety in PTC patients.