Open AccessFundamentals of logic, reasoning, and argumentation: an evidence-supported curriculum targeting scientific literacy to increase public understanding and engagement in science
Author(s) -
La Shun L. Carroll
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
multidisciplinary journal for education, social and technological sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2341-2593
DOI - 10.4995/muse.2020.12787
Subject(s) - argumentation theory , scientific literacy , construct (python library) , comprehension , epistemology , curriculum , cognitive science , science education , mathematics education , scientific reasoning , computer science , engineering ethics , management science , psychology , pedagogy , engineering , philosophy , programming language
The purpose of this article is to present an evidence-supported curriculum covering the fundamentals of logic, reasoning, and argumentation skills to address the emphasized basic knowledge, skills, and abilities required to be scientifically literate, which will prepare the public to understand and engage with science meaningfully. An analytic-synthetic approach toward understanding the notion of public is taken using a theoretical biomimetics framework that identifies naturally occurring objects or phenomena that descriptively captures the essence of a construct to facilitate creative problem- solving. In the present case, the problem being solved is how to reconcile what is meant by public, how it ought to be interpreted, determining the diverse levels of confidence in science that exist, and various understandings of science all with one another. The results demonstrate there is an inherent denotative-connotative inconsistency in the traditional notion of public that can be explicated through the concept of a fractal allowing for comprehension of the relationship between public confidence in, and understanding of, science.