Open AccessREADING INTEGRITY IN THE LANDSCAPE: METHODS’ COMPARISON ON TICINO AREA
Author(s) -
Mattia Previtali,
Paola Branduini,
Eugenia Spinelli,
Marco Tagliabue
Publication year - 2021
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.4995/arqueologica9.2021.12154
Subject(s) - cultural heritage , landscape assessment , structural integrity , cultural landscape , reading (process) , key (lock) , natural (archaeology) , computer science , geography , environmental resource management , archaeology , landscape design , environmental science , engineering , computer security , political science , structural engineering , law
The landscape is the system of both tangible and intangible heritage. A key element to evaluate a landscape is its integrity intended as the wholeness and intactness of natural and/or cultural heritage. The problem of identifying the integrity of a landscape is twofold: on one side it is necessary to identify the element that determines the intactness of a landscape and on the other side the methodology to study and quantify the integrity. Different methodologies have been developed in literature to assess and measure landscape integrity: some of them are more quantitative, while others are more qualitative. This paper presents two different methods for landscape integrity evaluation: the Valutazione Storico Ambientale (VASA) and the Landscape System Historical Analysis (LaHSA) one. The comparison of the two methodologies is carried out in a portion of the Ticino river (North Italy) and more specifically in the municipality of Morimondo. The two methods are compared considering a set of elements taking into account both the understanding of tangible and intangible permanencies and data accessibility/accuracy to carry out the analysis.