Open Access
Efficacy of Foliar Applications, Trunk Injections, and Soil Drenches in Reducing Populations of Elongate Hemlock Scale on Eastern Hemlock
Author(s) -
Michael J. Raupp,
Robert G. Ahern,
Brad Onken,
Richard C. Reardon,
Stacey Bealmear,
Joseph J. Doccola,
Paul Wolfe,
Peter A. Becker
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
arboriculture and urban forestry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.222
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 2155-0778
pISSN - 1935-5297
DOI - 10.48044/jauf.2008.044
Subject(s) - biology , pyriproxyfen , acephate , imidacloprid , agronomy , trunk , toxicology , pesticide , botany
We examined the efficacy of two approaches for controlling elongate hemlock scale on eastern hemlocks in an arboretum. One approach relied on foliar applications of an insect growth regulator, pyriproxyfen, and horticultural spray oil when crawlers were abundant. The second approach evaluated soil drenches and trunk injections of the systemic insecticides imidacloprid, dinotefuron, and acephate. Foliar applications of pyriproxyfen and horticultural oil provided superior levels of control of elongate hemlock scale compared with soil drenches, trunk injections, or implants of insecticides in the year that applications were made. After foliar sprays, population reductions were rapid and, in the case of pyriproxyfen, lasted into the second growing season. By the third year, significant differences in elongate hemlock scale populations were no longer found among trees treated with insecticides and those that were not. Imidacloprid applied as a soil drench had limited efficacy in reducing populations of elongate hemlock scale on one date in the first season. Acephate implants and trunk injections of dinotefuron did not reduce the abundance of elongate hemlock scale relative to untreated trees. Arborists can achieve high levels of control of elongate hemlock scale with foliar sprays of pyriproxyfen or horticultural oil applied when crawlers are abundant in spring.