z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A comparative review of the literature surrounding complications associated with percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus open surgical tracheostomy
Author(s) -
Holly Newton,
Shadaba Ahmed
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
morecambe bay medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2634-0631
pISSN - 1466-707X
DOI - 10.48037/mbmj.v8i1.50
Subject(s) - percutaneous , medicine , critically ill , tracheotomy , surgery , surgical procedures , intensive care medicine , general surgery
In this structured review, I aim to discuss the principle of tracheostomies including what they are and why we perform them. My main objective is to explore the literature surrounding whether or not there is a better option between open surgical and percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy, based on the complications with which they are associated. Simply put, a tracheostomy is a common surgical procedure performed on critically ill patients in order to facilitate their breathing. I will discuss the two main types of tracheostomy: open surgical (OST) and percutaneous dilatational (PDT), along with their accompanying impediments. 

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here