Open AccessTHE REALITY OF APPLYING THE QUALITY INDICATORS OF ACADIMC STAFF IN LIBYAN UNIVERSITIES: THE FACULTY OF ARTS, THE UNIVERSITY OF TRIPOLI, AS A MODEL
Author(s) -
Faiza Salem Grifa
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
rimak international journal of humanities and social sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2717-8293
DOI - 10.47832/2717-8293.2-3.11
Subject(s) - sample (material) , quality (philosophy) , dimension (graph theory) , the arts , significant difference , medical education , psychology , reliability (semiconductor) , validity , mathematics education , medicine , political science , mathematics , statistics , clinical psychology , philosophy , chemistry , power (physics) , physics , epistemology , chromatography , quantum mechanics , pure mathematics , law , psychometrics
The study aimed to identify the reality of applying indicators of academic staff’s quality in Libyan universities. Furthermore, the study attempted to know the obstacles that prevent the application of it. Moreover, the study aimed to explore whether there is a difference in estimating the degree of importance of these obstacles according to: academic degree, academic qualification, and experience years. A descriptive and analytical research design was adopted. To answer the study questions, a questionnaire was developed and its validity and reliability were assured. The study sample (N=50) was drawn from academic staff at Tripoli University, Faculty of Arts. Results related to the first dimension showed that all indicators of this dimension were weak), which indicates a low availability of indicators to achieve the quality of the faculty academic members. With regard to the second dimension, the results showed that all indicators of this dimension were high, which indicates however, the level of availability of obstacles to the application of quality indicators for faculty members was high. The findings also indicated that there was no significant difference in estimating the degree of importance of obstacles to the application of quality indicators of faculty academic members according to: academic degree, academic qualification, and years of experience.