z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Szokásjog és analógia a büntető jogalkalmazás történetében és jelenében
Author(s) -
István Ambrus
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
erdélyi jogélet
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2734-7095
pISSN - 2734-6226
DOI - 10.47745/erjog.2021.03.01
Subject(s) - principle of legality , analogy , criminalization , law , supreme court , obligation , interpretation (philosophy) , criminal law , political science , criminal liability , philosophy , epistemology , linguistics
In my article, I deal with the prohibition of customary law and analogy to the detriment of the perpetrator. Both mentioned prohibitions arise from the principle of legality. The starting point of the analysis is a decision of the Hungarian Supreme Court in 1898 dealing with the criminal offence of theft related to electricity. I presented examples of the extensive and then of the restrictive interpretation by Hungarian criminal courts. My conclusion is that the principle of legality may obviously infringe, for example, criminal liability extended by analogy. However, an overly restrictive interpretation must also be avoided, as this could threaten to violate the state’s obligation for criminalization.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here