z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Responsibility Center Budgeting as a Mechanism to Deal with Academic Moral Hazard
Author(s) -
Gordon M. Myers
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
canadian journal of higher education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2293-6602
pISSN - 0316-1218
DOI - 10.47678/cjhe.v49i3.188491
Subject(s) - moral hazard , revenue , incentive , intuition , agency (philosophy) , business , economics , finance , actuarial science , public relations , political science , microeconomics , sociology , psychology , social science , cognitive science
Universities face inherent informational asymmetries. These make university budgeting prone to various challenges including moral hazard. The last forty years has seen some large research- intensive universities move from centralized incremental budgeting to decentralized Responsibility Center Budgeting (RCB). It is assumed that a faculty chooses a level of costly effort in generating revenue for the university. The level of faculty effort is not observable by the central administration. When there is no revenue uncertainty or when the faculty is not risk averse, pure RCB is best from the perspective of the administration. The intuition is that pure RCB fully aligns financial responsibility with academic authority, that is, it makes the faculty the residual claimant. Once the faculty is risk averse, partial RCB is optimal. Partial RCB provides a balance between providing the right incentives to the faculty and the university reducing the revenue risk faced by the faculty.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here