z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
More Than a Pipeline Problem: Evaluating the Gender Pay Gap in Canadian Academia from 1996 to 2016
Author(s) -
Bessma Momani,
Emma Dreher,
Kira Williams
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
canadian journal of higher education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2293-6602
pISSN - 0316-1218
DOI - 10.47678/cjhe.v49i1.188197
Subject(s) - salary , gender pay gap , productivity , scope (computer science) , public sector , higher education , demographic economics , pipeline (software) , political science , labour economics , public relations , economics , economic growth , wage , engineering , law , programming language , mechanical engineering , computer science
This article measures gender pay gaps in Ontario’s public post-secondary education sector from 1996 to 2016 using the Public Sector Salary Disclosure Data. We find gaps widening among all faculty ranks. Men were paid on average 2.06%, 2.14%, and 5.26% more than their women colleagues for all employees, university teaching staff, and deans, respectively. We also conduct a Blinder- Oaxaca decomposition to measure the source of gendered salary differentials. Pay gaps persist during this time period despite controlling for the literature’s most common explanations, including the “pipeline effect.” Our results additionally imply that women’s years of experience in academia do not mitigate the observed pay gaps. Suggestions for future research include increasing the scope of our study to factor in finer details such as labour productivity.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here