Open AccessResearch Integrity/Misconduct Policies of Canadian Universities
Author(s) -
Jordan Richard Schoenherr,
Bryn Williams–Jones
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
canadian journal of higher education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2293-6602
pISSN - 0316-1218
DOI - 10.47678/cjhe.v41i1.2173
Subject(s) - misconduct , scientific misconduct , research integrity , sanctions , academic integrity , context (archaeology) , political science , corporate governance , public relations , criminology , engineering ethics , psychology , business , law , engineering , medicine , paleontology , alternative medicine , finance , pathology , biology
In a context of increasing attention to issues of scientific integrity in university research, it is important to reflect on the governance mechanisms that universities use to shape the behavior of students, researchers, and faculty. This paper presents the results of a study of 47 Canadian university research integrity/misconduct (RIM) policies: 41 institutions (87%) had distinct policies dealing with research misconduct, 37 (90%) of which took the form of research integrity/misconduct policies. For each of these 41 documents, we assessed the stated policy objectives and the existence (or not) of procedures for managing allegations of misconduct, definitions of misconduct, and sanctions. Our analysis revealed that, like their American counterparts, most Canadian universities had policies that contained the key elements relevant to protecting research integrity and managing misconduct. Yet, there was significant variability in the structure and content of these policies, particularly with regard to practical guidance for university personnel and review bodies.