Open AccessAn Evaluation of Pay Equity Reports at Five Canadian Universities
Author(s) -
James M. Dean,
Rodney A. Clifton
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
canadian journal of higher education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2293-6602
pISSN - 0316-1218
DOI - 10.47678/cjhe.v24i3.183257
Subject(s) - salary , strengths and weaknesses , equity (law) , actuarial science , pay equity , higher education , accounting , psychology , econometrics , economics , political science , social psychology , labour economics , law , economic growth
This paper reviews five reports measuring discrimination in salaries between males and females at Canadian universities. All find some discrimination (3% to 8%), a result in accord with published research on the same topic. However, the approaches taken are quite different, often reflecting controversial decisions over which variables would be included to explain salary differentials. We examine the strengths and weaknesses of these reports. In particular, the focus on single equation models is a problem since some of the controversial variables, which may be biased by discrimination, also contain some information which explains legitimate differences in salaries. Our review suggests that many of the models are probably misspecified. We conclude with a call for universities to collect the information which is required to complete these studies expeditiously and accurately.